| Entry-point compatibility |
A nail designed for suprapatellar insertion with a compatible protective sleeve and instrumentation. |
The sleeve helps protect the patellofemoral cartilage and surrounding soft tissues while the knee is flexed only slightly. |
Confirm the recommended entry position, sleeve dimensions, required knee flexion, and compatibility with the planned imaging setup. |
| Proximal-third fracture control |
A nail offering multiple proximal interlocking options, including multidirectional screws or screws positioned close to the proximal segment. |
Very proximal fractures are more prone to procurvatum, valgus or varus malalignment, and loss of control during nail insertion. |
Review the number, orientation, and working length of proximal locking options on the implant technique guide. |
| Distal-third fracture control |
A nail with at least two stable distal locking options, preferably in different planes, and adequate distal reach. |
Short distal segments have limited bone available for fixation and require strong control against translation and rotation. |
Check the distance from the distal nail tip to the available locking holes and confirm screw trajectories on radiographs or templating software. |
| Tibial alignment correction |
A system that permits blocking screws, reduction aids, or other adjuncts when the fracture pattern is unstable. |
Suprapatellar insertion improves control of the proximal fragment, but the nail alone may not correct deformity in metaphyseal fractures. |
Plan the reduction method before reaming; identify whether temporary clamps, blocking screws, traction, or open assistance may be required. |
| Nail diameter selection |
The largest diameter that can be safely accommodated after appropriate reaming, without compromising the tibial cortex. |
A suitable diameter improves structural support, while excessive diameter can increase cortical stress and technical difficulty. |
Use preoperative imaging and intraoperative measurements; account for canal shape, curvature, and the quality of the cortical bone. |
| Nail length and curvature |
A length that provides reliable fixation without distal prominence, combined with curvature appropriate for the patient’s tibial anatomy. |
Incorrect length or curvature can make insertion difficult, affect alignment, or cause distal cortical contact. |
Template on full-length tibial images when possible and compare the nail’s curvature with the patient’s sagittal and coronal anatomy. |
| Locking strategy |
Static locking for length- or rotation-unstable fractures, with the option for controlled dynamization in selected healing situations. |
The locking configuration should match fracture stability, bone quality, and the amount of metaphyseal or segmental comminution. |
Confirm hole position, screw length range, end-cap options, and whether locking is performed freehand or through a targeting guide. |
| Open or contaminated injury |
A nail used only within an appropriate staged or definitive treatment plan that includes debridement and soft-tissue management. |
The implant choice cannot compensate for inadequate debridement, infection control, or coverage of compromised soft tissue. |
Classify the injury, document contamination and soft-tissue status, and coordinate the fixation plan with the trauma and reconstructive teams. |
| Patellofemoral safety |
A smooth, well-fitting sleeve system and an insertion technique that avoids forceful advancement or malposition. |
The suprapatellar route passes through the extensor mechanism and requires careful protection of cartilage and soft tissues. |
Inspect the sleeve, confirm its position fluoroscopically, and avoid advancing the nail against resistance. |
| Bone quality |
Multiple locking points and a fixation plan adapted to osteoporotic or pathologic bone. |
Poor bone quality can reduce screw purchase and increase the risk of loss of alignment or fixation failure. |
Assess radiographs, computed tomography when indicated, fracture comminution, and the expected quality of the proximal and distal segments. |
| Instrumentation and workflow |
Accurate targeting guides, clear radiographic markers, reliable depth gauges, and instruments that support both suprapatellar and reduction techniques. |
Efficient instrumentation reduces unnecessary fluoroscopy, positioning changes, and errors during locking. |
Check instrument availability, compatibility, sterilization status, and the team’s familiarity with the complete system. |
| Clinical evidence and training |
Prefer systems supported by peer-reviewed clinical data, transparent instructions for use, and surgeon experience with the suprapatellar technique. |
Outcomes depend on fracture selection, reduction, soft-tissue handling, and postoperative care—not on implant design alone. |
Review independent clinical studies, regulatory documentation, reported complications, and local surgical experience before adoption. |